Here’s a question I received recently about the nuances of the English language.

Question: Which of the following is correct:
a. I would like to send Peter an email AND give him my regards.
b. I would like to send Peter an email TO give him my regards.

As in so many cases, the answer is . . . both, depending on your intended meaning. Let’s look at these two statements to figure out which one to use.

SENTENCE A: AND

“I would like to send Peter an email AND give him my regards.”

This statement has two potential meanings.

First, this sentence could mean that I want to do two separate actions: (1) send Peter an email, and (2) give Peter my regards. These actions might happen at the same time, or they might not. This sentence isn’t clear. To understand how this sentence describes two actions, we can compare it to a similar sentence with the same structure: “I want to make a million dollars AND take a trip to the Bahamas.” They are separate actions. 

To help clarify that they are separate actions, we can revise the sentence to read, “I would like to send Peter an email and also give him my regards.”

On the other hand, this sentence could mean that I will send my regards to Peter through an email. These are not separate actions: they are one action, or, more specifically, one action and its purpose. In this case, sentence A is elliptical, meaning some implied words are left out. The full sentence is “I would like to send Peter an email and [by doing so] give him my regards.”

Here’s the point: Sentence A has more than one possible meaning. It’s not wrong—it’s vague.

SENTENCE B: TO

“I would like to send Peter an email TO give him my regards.”

This sentence has one possible meaning: I want to give Peter my regards, and I will do it by sending him an email. This sentence is identical in meaning to “I would like to send Peter an email for the purpose of giving him my regards.”

CHOOSING WHICH WORD TO USE

I always prefer to use exact language: words and sentences that mean what I am trying to say and that don’t mean anything else. In this case, I would use Sentence B TO state my message.

Free E-book to Improve Your Writing Skills

Top writing strategies and expert instruction from each of Precise Edit’s writing guides 1 critical article from Precise Edit Training Manual 8 days of instruction from 300 Days of Better Writing 5 top strategies from Bang! Writing with Impact 2 essential word choices from Which Word Do I Use? 1 major comma use from Zen Comma 1 section on main verbs from Concise Guide to Technical and Academic Writing Get the free e-book (PDF) OR Purchase the Kindle version ($0.99).

The Question

I have just bought a novel, Jonathan Swift’s Gulliver’s Travels. 

There is a page about Jonathan Swift’s life. There, I found a sentence which I cannot analyze grammatically, no matter how much I am scratching my head to come up with an answer. The sentence is: 

“At the age of thirty-one, Swift returned to Ireland as chaplain to a lord justice.” 

To me, this sentence is 100% wrong grammatically. It should be: 

“At the age of thirty-one, Swift returned to Ireland as A chaplain to a lord justice.” 

Here is my reason: “chaplain” cannot be used without an “A” in front of it because it is in singular and an “A” is needed in front of it.

What do you think? Do you agree with me? 

My response.

The original sentence is correct.

Using “a chaplain” would imply that the lord justice had more than one chaplain and that Swift was one of them. As it is written, the lord justice had one chaplain, and Swift had that position.

“A” is an indefinite article, indicating one thing within a group or category. With “a” in the original sentence, the sentence would indicate that Swift was one chaplain in a group of chaplains to the lord justice.

(Note that “a” precedes “lord justice,” which indicates that Ireland had more than one lord justice.)

If any word is left out, it is “the,” as in “the chaplain to a lord justice.” However, “the” is implied and can be safely left out without changing the meaning of the sentence.

To help explain, let’s look at a comparable sentence and see if we need “a.”

“Obama returned to Washington as president to the United States.”

In this comparable sentence, “president” is the title of a position, and only one person can have the title of president to the United States. If we state, instead, “a president,” we imply that the U.S. has more than one.

Here’s a comparable sentence using “a.”

“Darwin returned to England as a leader of the scientific community.”

In this sentence, Darwin was a leader, but he was not the only leader. If we leave out “a,” as in “as leader of the scientific community,” we imply the missing word “the.” By leaving out “a,” therefore, we would indicate that Darwin was the only leader.

Now, back to the original sentence. In the original sentence, Swift returned to Ireland to be the one, and only one, chaplain to a lord bishop. Thus, the sentence does not need “a.”

Which choice is correct? Please explain your reasons.

“English is not my mother tongue language. But I don’t have any ………… when I speak with native speakers of English. I can understand them very well.”

a) problems
b) problem

Short answer

This is a good question, but one without a clear answer. The short answer is that “any problems” is the more common way to say this. (Another common way to say this is “I don’t have a problem.”)

See here for a comparison of usage: http://bit.ly/WnAsbR

But this is sneaky. Let’s look at the long answer.

Long answer

If I say, “I don’t have any problems,” then I admit the possibility that I may have one problem. If someone asks me, “Do you have any problems,” I can correctly answer “no” if I have a single problem. I don’t have problems, but I do have a problem. Then, when the problem occurs, a person may say, “Hey, you said you didn’t have problems,” and I can answer, “That’s right. I don’t have more than one problem, but I do have one problem.” As I said, this is a sneaky way to answer.

On the other hand, if I say, “I don’t have any problem,” then I allow the possibility that I have more than one problem. If someone asks me, “Do you have any problem,” I can correctly answer “no” if I have several problems. I don’t have just one problem, but I have several problems. Then, when problems occur, the person can say, “Hey, you said you didn’t have a problem,” and I can answer “That’s right. I don’t have a single problem, but I do have more than one problem.” This, too, is a sneaky way to answer.

The answers are sneaky because the literal meanings may conflict with the implied meanings. I say one thing, and the listener thinks I mean something else. I answer that I don’t have one problem, or don’t have multiple problems, but the listener will assume I mean zero problems.

To get back to the original question, you have two options.

1. Most common way to say this: “any problems.”

2. Literal answer: Choose “I don’t have any problem” to indicate you don’t have a single problem or choose “I don’t have any problems” to indicate you don’t have multiple problems.

My recommendation: use “any problems.” If you have one problem, you are likely to have other problems, too. If you use “any problems,” the message you send is that not even one problem will occur, thus covering all possibilities.

Perhaps our friend will ask a question about “that” and “which.” By comparison, the answer is much simpler.

Our friend from afar sent a real poser of a question. Not easy to answer, but much more interesting.

The Question

I have a question. Which choice is correct? Please explain your reasons.

“Mr. Johnson is a very knowledgeable English teacher. He can answer any ………….. about grammar.”

a) question
b) questions

My Answer 

Another tricky question. This question isn’t about grammar; it’s about context. A and B are both possible solutions, but the most likely correct answer is B, “questions.”

“Any” can indicate one or more than one. For example, “Go get any book” means the same as “Go get any one book” and “Go get a book.” However, “Go get any books” means the same as “Go get some books.” In your question below, as with many issues regarding grammar and word choice, we have to look not only at the specific problem but also at the message being conveyed. We have to understand the context in which the problem occurs.

Now, why is B the most likely correct answer?

The answer is in the context. If Mr. Johnson is a very knowledgeable English teacher, he can answer more than one question, which means he can answer questions.

Let’s think about the message being conveyed here. If you think of any (one) question about grammar, Mr. Johnson can answer it. However, if you think of a different question, Mr. Johnson can answer that question, too. Thus, Mr. Johnson has the ability to answer more than one question. Again, this means Mr. Johnson can answer questions.

“Mr. Johnson can answer any question about grammar” is most appropriate in one particular instance. Let’s say that Mr. Johnson has just given a presentation and that people have questions about grammar. Although he has the knowledge to answer all their questions (any questions), he only has time to answer one question. Knowing this, someone says, “Mr. Johnson can answer any question,” meaning Mr. Johnson, because of his time constraints, is only able at this time to answer one.

Let’s look at similar case.

If a teacher asks students “Do you have any question?” then the teacher expects the students to have one question. This is the same as asking “Do you have a question?” (In this situation, “a” is more common than “any.”) On the other hand, if the teacher asks students “Do you have any questions?” then the teacher understands that the students may have more than one question. In this case, as with Mr. Johnson, “any questions” is more appropriate because it allows the possibility for more than one.

With permission from my new friend in Iran, the question and my answer are below. How would you answer this question, and do you agree with mine? 

English Question 

Which of the following options is correct?
A) Is there any difference between strange and peculiar in English?
B) Are there any differences between strange and peculiar in English? 

My Answer 

Unfortunately, this is one of those questions with more than one answer. 

If we ask, “Is there any difference,” then we assume that there might be ONE difference. If we ask, “Are there any differences,” then we assume that there might be MORE THAN ONE difference. Both are correct, depending on the interpretation. 

For example, we can ask, “Are there any differences between cars and bicycles?” We can then list many differences. However, we can also ask, “What is the difference between cars and bicycles?” We then need to provide a single defining difference, such as they differ in how they are propelled. 

Generally, however, when we are discussing word meanings, we use is. Another, more common, way to ask this question is, “What is the difference between strange and peculiar?” This form of the question indicates that they have one difference (i.e., the one difference is that they have different meanings). 

Short answer: Both are right.
Best answer: The first sentence is the typical way to ask this question.

This answer isn’t clear-cut, I know, but that’s the fun of English. 

(Update on my answer: We can rephrase this question as “How do the words strange and peculiar differ?” and avoid the problem.)